Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53423

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
M.D.BAIJU, C.M SANDEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13614 OF 2019

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.G.KARTHIKEYAN, NIREESH MATHEW
For the Respondents: None

The dismissal of the writ petition was based on the finding that the prayers had become infructuous, reflecting the principle that courts do not entertain cases without a present need for judicial resolution.

Headnote:The writ petition was presented by the petitioners, who argued that the requests made had become infructuous. The Court recorded this submission and subsequently dismissed the petition based on the same reasoning, concluding that there was no longer a need for adjudication.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayers in the writ petition have become infructuous. This is recorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53423

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JM.D.BAIJU, C.M SANDEEP – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 13614 OF 2019

The dismissal of the writ petition was based on the finding that the prayers had become infructuous, reflecting the principle that courts do not entertain cases without a present need for judicial resolution.

Headnote:The writ petition was presented by the petitioners, who argued that the requests made had become infructuous. The Court recorded this submission and subsequently dismissed the petition based on the same reasoning, concluding that there was no longer a need for adjudication.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
M.D.BAIJU, C.M SANDEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 13614 OF 2019