Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53424

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
M/s MARY MATHA VENTURES INDIA PVT.LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 18462 OF 2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.G.KARTHIKEYAN, NIREESH MATHEW, C.C.THOMAS
For the Respondents: ANISH JAIN, SREEJITH V.S

Writ petitions deemed infructuous are dismissed for lack of substance in ongoing claims.

Headnote:The petitioner's writ petition was deemed infructuous as the counsel submitted that the prayers have become mooted. The court recorded this submission and consequently dismissed the petition. The dismissal indicates a lack of substantive grounds for continuing with the matter. Resultantly, the court ordered the dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayers in the writ petition have become infructuous. This is recorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53424

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JM/s MARY MATHA VENTURES INDIA PVT.LTD. – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 18462 OF 2021

Writ petitions deemed infructuous are dismissed for lack of substance in ongoing claims.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
M/s MARY MATHA VENTURES INDIA PVT.LTD. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 18462 OF 2021