Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
JASEENA MOL – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks reconsideration of transport permit application. (Para 1) |
| 2. government pleader notes lack of required documents. (Para 2) |
| 3. court directs timely action on permit decision. (Para 3) |
J U D G M E N T
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers;
“i. Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writs, order or direction, directing the respondents to re-consider the application regular permit on the route Thiruvegappura – Kalloor in respect of SC KL 40 9697 and pass final orders which was adjourned on 19.06.2025, in the next RTA meeting;
ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or such other writs, order or direction, directing the Secretary, RTA, Palakkad to obtain orders from the Chairman, RTA, Palakkad to circulate the application regular permit on the route Thiruvegappura – Kalloor in respect of SC KL 40 9697 which was adjourned on
19.06.2025;
iii. to grant such other reliefs as this Honorable Court may deem fit and proper;”
2. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that the petitioner has not produced the modified timings, nor produced the records of the vehicle. This is recorded.
3. Taking note of the fact that the application for a fresh regula
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
