Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53432

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SATHISH NINAN, P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJ
THUMBAKUTHIRUMMAL SREEDHARAN – Appellant
Versus
THYAMBATH LAKSHMI – Respondent
RP NO. 23 OF 2019 | AFA NO.20 OF 1995

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.SASINDRAN, SATHEESHAN ALAKKADAN, T.KRISHNANUNNI
For the Respondents: SREEJA SOHAN K., R.REJI (ATTINGAL)

A review petition becomes infructuous when the judgment sought to be reviewed is recalled.

Headnote:The review petition seeks to challenge the judgment dated 02.09.2016. The Court identified that the judgment had been recalled and thus, the review petition has become infructuous. The petitioner's contentions remain open for the appeal.

Result: the review petition is closed.

Sathish Ninan, J.

The judgment dated 02.09.2016, sought to be reviewed, has been recalled as per the order dated 28.11.2025 in I.A.No.1 of 2019 in A.F.A.No.20 of 1995. In the light thereof, the review petition has become infructuous.

Leaving open the contentions of the review petitioner to be urged in the appeal, this review petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53432

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMSATHISH NINAN, P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJTHUMBAKUTHIRUMMAL SREEDHARAN – AppellantVersusTHYAMBATH LAKSHMI – RespondentRP NO. 23 OF 2019 | AFA NO.20 OF 1995

A review petition becomes infructuous when the judgment sought to be reviewed is recalled.

Headnote:The review petition seeks to challenge the judgment dated 02.09.2016. The Court identified that the judgment had been recalled and thus, the review petition has become infructuous. The petitioner's contentions remain open for the appeal. Result: the review petition is closed.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SATHISH NINAN, P. KRISHNA KUMAR, JJ
THUMBAKUTHIRUMMAL SREEDHARAN – Appellant
Versus
THYAMBATH LAKSHMI – Respondent
RP NO. 23 OF 2019 | AFA NO.20 OF 1995

Headnote:The review petition seeks to challenge the judgment dated 02.09.2016. The Court identified that the judgment had been recalled and thus, the review petition has become infructuous. The petitioner's contentions remain open for the appeal.

Result: the review petition is closed.