SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53438

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
DEEPAK T.R – Appellant
Versus
ASHMA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri.V.JOHN MANI, Shri.SETHULAKSHMI K.K., Smt.FATHIMA SHAHNA A.A.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner suffered ex-parte order in M.C.No. 225 of

2023 pending on the files of the Family Court, Attingal. He filed Ext.P3 petition to set aside the ex-parte order. It is still pending as evident from Ext.P5 copy of the proceedings sheet. The limited prayer of the petitioner is to give a direction to the Family Court, Attingal, to dispose of Ext.P3 petition.

2. Considering the nature of the order going to be passed, I am of the view that notice need not be issued to the respondents.

3. It is submitted that connected matters between the same parties are pending before the same Family Court, in which already there is a direction to dispose of the same within a time frame. Hence, there will be a direction to the Family Court, Attingal, to dispose of Ext.P3 petition within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The original petition is disposed of as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top