SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53446

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
PRASAD K.R. – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.M.ZIRAJ, SHRI.IRFAN ZIRAJ
For the Respondents: learned Government Pleader

JUDGMENT

Petitioner's vehicle was seized by the 1st respondent/Inspector of Police, alleging violation of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 , and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 ('M.M.D.R.' Act, for short). Petitioner wants to compound the alleged offences, for which the solitary obstacle is the fact that the seizure has not been reported to the 2nd respondent/District Geologist by the 1st respondent/Inspector of Police.

2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents, this Court directs the 1st respondent/Inspector of Police to report the seizure before the 2nd respondent/District Geologist within a period of three days from today. Once the seizure is reported, the District Geologist will consider petitioner's application for compounding, in terms of Section 23A of the M.M.D.R.

Act, in accordance with law, expeditiously.

The Writ Petition (Civil) will stand disposed of, as above.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top