IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
PRASAD K.R. – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PERAMANGALAM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Petitioner's vehicle was seized by the 1st respondent/Inspector of Police, alleging violation of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2015 , and the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 ('M.M.D.R.' Act, for short). Petitioner wants to compound the alleged offences, for which the solitary obstacle is the fact that the seizure has not been reported to the 2nd respondent/District Geologist by the 1st respondent/Inspector of Police.
2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents, this Court directs the 1st respondent/Inspector of Police to report the seizure before the 2nd respondent/District Geologist within a period of three days from today. Once the seizure is reported, the District Geologist will consider petitioner's application for compounding, in terms of Section 23A of the M.M.D.R.
Act, in accordance with law, expeditiously.
The Writ Petition (Civil) will stand disposed of, as above.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.