SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53448

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SANTHOSH EAPEN – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE, SRI.P.PRIJITH, SRI.R.GITHESH, SHRI.AJAY BEN JOSE, SRI.MANJUNATH MENON, SHRI.SACHIN JACOB AMBAT, SMT.ANNA LINDA EDEN, SMT.RIZLANA NAZAR P.V., SMT. KARTHIKA SAROJ, SHRI.HARIKRISHNAN S., SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (SR.)
For the Respondents: SRI.S.SREEKUMAR PP, SRI.M.P.PRASANTH

O R D E R

The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Criminal Miscellaneous Case may be dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to raise all his contentions before the Special Court, subject to the final outcome of the bail application to be considered by the Special Court.

Recording the above submission, the Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top