Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53457

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
SHAFEEK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3888 OF 2020

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.K.PREMJITH MENON, SRI.BINU V V VEETTIL VALAPPIL
For the Respondents: SRI.G.ANOOP MOHAN, SMT. SEENA C., PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Court upheld the closure of a criminal case due to amicable settlement between parties.

Headnote:The judgment examines the closure of the criminal miscellaneous case following settlement between the petitioner and respondents, noting the absence of further disputes. The court determines that in light of the amicable resolution, the case is dismissed. The basis for this resolution reflects principles of judicial economy and resolution of conflicts outside the courtroom. Ultimately, the court concludes that the Crl.M.C. is closed.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this Crl.M.C.

need not be continued, since the matter has been amicably settled between the parties before the Trial Court.

Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Crl.M.C. is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53457

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMG. GIRISH, JSHAFEEK – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 3888 OF 2020

Court upheld the closure of a criminal case due to amicable settlement between parties.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
SHAFEEK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 3888 OF 2020