2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53459

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
MALATHY – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRAN – Respondent
CRL.REV.PET NO. 4260 OF 2006

The court dismissed the revision petition because the petitioner chose not to pursue it.

Headnote:{'statute_analysis': 'This judgment concerns a criminal revision petition under the Indian Penal Code governing revisions in criminal cases.', 'facts_of_case': 'The petitioner, Malathy, approached the court for a revision petition against the judgment dated 24.11.2005 in SC NO.220 OF 1998 from the District Court & Sessions Court, Palakkad.', 'findings_of_court': 'The court determined that the revision petition was not pressed by the petitioner.', 'issues': 'Whether the revision petition should be entertained.', 'ratio_decidendi': 'The plea to entertain the revision petition was dismissed on the basis that it was not pursued by the petitioner.', 'result': 'The revision petition stands dismissed as not pressed.'}