Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
SUNIL MANGRATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's view on bail applicability (Para 1 , 5) |
| 2. possession of narcotics (Para 2) |
| 3. arguments for and against bail (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. granting of bail conditions (Para 8) |
O R D E R
This is an application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 .
2. The petitioner is accused No.1 in Crime No.120/2025 of Excise Range Office, Palakkad. The offences alleged against the petitioner and the other accused are punishable under Sections 22 (b)(ii)(B) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 .
3. The prosecution case is that on 12.10.2025 at
6.30 p.m., the petitioner and the other accused were found in possession 14.396 Kg of ganja for the purpose of sale.
4. The petitioner was arrested on 12.10.2025 and he has been in judicial custody since then.
5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Pubic Prosecutor.
6. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the investigation is practically over and further detention of the petitioner is not required.
7. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail plea of the petitioner.
8. Having regard to the nature of the allegation, stage of investigation and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
