SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53466

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
SUNIL MANGRATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Application No. 13675 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MOHAMED SABAH, SRI.LIBIN STANLEY, SMT.SAIPOOJA, SRI.SADIK ISMAYIL, SMT.R.GAYATHRI, SRI.M.MAHIN HAMZA, SHRI.ALWIN JOSEPH, SHRI.BENSON AMBROSE
For the Respondents: SRI.G.SUDHEER, PP

Bail granted under specific conditions due to nearly completed investigation.

Headnote:This bail application arises under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner, accused No.1 in Crime No.120/2025, was arrested for possession of 14.396 Kg of ganja. The court finds that the investigation is nearly complete and bail is appropriate under the stipulated conditions. The petitioner must appear regularly before the Investigating Officer and adhere to the bail conditions to avoid cancellation. Bail is allowed.

Table of Content
1. court's view on bail applicability (Para 1 , 5)
2. possession of narcotics (Para 2)
3. arguments for and against bail (Para 6 , 7)
4. granting of bail conditions (Para 8)

O R D E R

This is an application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 .

2. The petitioner is accused No.1 in Crime No.120/2025 of Excise Range Office, Palakkad. The offences alleged against the petitioner and the other accused are punishable under Sections 22 (b)(ii)(B) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 .

3. The prosecution case is that on 12.10.2025 at

6.30 p.m., the petitioner and the other accused were found in possession 14.396 Kg of ganja for the purpose of sale.

4. The petitioner was arrested on 12.10.2025 and he has been in judicial custody since then.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Pubic Prosecutor.

6. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the investigation is practically over and further detention of the petitioner is not required.

7. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail plea of the petitioner.

8. Having regard to the nature of the allegation, stage of investigation and the tenure of judicial custody undergone by the petitioner, I am of the view that the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail on conditions.

In the result, the Bail Application is allowed as follows:

(a) The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing bond for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional court.

(b) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays and Fridays between 10 A.M. and 11 A.M. till the final report is filed.

(c) The petitioner shall surrender his passport before the jurisdictional court. If he has no passport, the petitioner shall file an affidavit to that effect.

(d) The petitioner shall not leave the State of Kerala without the permission of the jurisdictional court.

(e) The petitioner shall not commit any similar offence while on bail.

(f) The petitioner shall not try to influence the prosecution witnesses or attempt to tamper with the evidence.

(g) If any of the bail conditions are violated by the petitioner, the jurisdictional Court will be at liberty to cancel the bail, in accordance with law.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top