SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53474

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
JAGANNATHAN C.S. – Appellant
Versus
THE FEDERAL BANK LTD. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.HAMZATH ALI V.K., SMT.AYISHA AFRIN A.V.K., SHRI.MUHAMMAD SHAMEEL K., SHRI.ABDULLA FUHAD K., SMT.AYISHA THASLEEMA N.P.
For the Respondents: SMT.HARITHA P.N., P.NARAYANAN

JUDGMENT

1. The petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking direction to unfreeze the account of the petitioner with the 1st respondent/Bank.

2. The learned Government Pleader for the 4th respondent submitted that the petitioner is the 1st accused in the Crime No.135/2024 of the 4th respondent/Police Station, the amount of Rs.5,50,000/- obtained through cybercrime came directly to the account of the petitioner, and the petitioner is not cooperating with the investigation in spite of issuing notice to him. In such a case, this is not a fit case for this Court to exercise discretion under Article 226 of the Constitution in favour of the petitioner. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top