Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53476

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
DEVINE ABRAHAM CHIRAYIL – Appellant
Versus
NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35478 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIREESH MATHEW, SRI.VIVEK VENUGOPAL, SRI.BABU JOSE, SHRI.GAJENDRA SINGH RAJPUROHIT, SHRI.AKHIL GEORGE, SHRI.ATHUL POULOSE
For the Respondents: SHRI.R.VINU RAJ – SPL PP/R1, SHRI.SUNIL SHANKER - SC, SMT.VIDYA GANGADHARAN

The court resolved the writ petition as the applicant's grievances were addressed by the defreezing of the account, indicating no further dispute.

Headnote:The petitioner sought relief regarding the freezing of his bank account as a result of actions initiated by the Narcotic Control Bureau. The Court noted that the issue was resolved as the account was defreezed without further grievance from the petitioner. The petition was subsequently closed based on these developments. The Court concluded there wasn't any outstanding issue to adjudicate, based on the representation by the learned Counsel. The writ petition is closed.

J U D G M E N T

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that pursuant to the further direction from the 1^st respondent, the account of the petitioner by the 2^nd respondent is defreezed, and there is no grievance for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53476

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMM.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, JDEVINE ABRAHAM CHIRAYIL – AppellantVersusNARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU – RespondentWP(C) NO. 35478 OF 2025

The court resolved the writ petition as the applicant's grievances were addressed by the defreezing of the account, indicating no further dispute.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
DEVINE ABRAHAM CHIRAYIL – Appellant
Versus
NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 35478 OF 2025