SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53476

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
DEVINE ABRAHAM CHIRAYIL – Appellant
Versus
NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NIREESH MATHEW, SRI.VIVEK VENUGOPAL, SRI.BABU JOSE, SHRI.GAJENDRA SINGH RAJPUROHIT, SHRI.AKHIL GEORGE, SHRI.ATHUL POULOSE
For the Respondents: SHRI.R.VINU RAJ – SPL PP/R1, SHRI.SUNIL SHANKER - SC, SMT.VIDYA GANGADHARAN

J U D G M E N T

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that pursuant to the further direction from the 1st respondent, the account of the petitioner by the 2nd respondent is defreezed, and there is no grievance for the petitioner. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top