2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53478
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MUHAMMEDALI – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6025 OF 2024
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.HARIHARAN, PRAVEEN.H, K.S.SMITHA, B.R.SINDU, V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, DENIZEN KOMATH
For the Respondents: ACHUTH KRISHNAN R., V.GIRISHKUMAR, S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA), JAISHANKAR V.NAIR, SUVIN.R.MENON, PARSHATHY S.R.
The court allows the withdrawal of a writ petition under Article 226, leading to its dismissal.
Headnote:Statute Analysis: The judgment pertains to a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking relief from transport regulatory decisions. Facts of the Case: The petitioner, represented by an attorney, seeks to withdraw the petition concerning vehicle registration and associated certificates.
Findings of Court:
The court grants permission to withdraw the writ petition, leading to its dismissal.
Issues: The primary question involves the withdrawal of the writ petition filed by the petitioner.
Ratio Decidendi: The court determines that voluntary withdrawal of the petition necessitates dismissal, following procedural norms.
Result: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
Back
