MUHAMMEDALI vs REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53478

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53478

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MUHAMMEDALI – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G.HARIHARAN, PRAVEEN.H, K.S.SMITHA, B.R.SINDU, V.R.SANJEEV KUMAR, DENIZEN KOMATH
For the Respondents: ACHUTH KRISHNAN R., V.GIRISHKUMAR, S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA), JAISHANKAR V.NAIR, SUVIN.R.MENON, PARSHATHY S.R.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. Permission is granted.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53478

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JMUHAMMEDALI – AppellantVersusREGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
MUHAMMEDALI – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent