SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53484

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J
ALEYAMMA MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.JINU JOSEPH, SMT.ANU PHILIPOSE
For the Respondents: SRI.PREMCHAND R NAIR, SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 27th day of November, 2025 Counsel for the petitioner submits that since an order has been passed during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to challenge the order now passed.

Granting such liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top