SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53517

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
NASEERA – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL RASAK – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.K.MOHAMED JAMEEL

ORDER

This revision petition has been filed by the wife and child in a proceedings under Section 125 of Cr.P.C, dissatisfied with the quantum of maintenance awarded by the Family Court, Malappuram.

2. The petitioner No.1 is the wife of the respondent.

The petitioner No.2 is the son born to the petitioner No.1 and respondent. The petitioner No.1 was granted a monthly maintenance of ₹1,000/- in M.C.No.495/2012 by the Family Court, Malappuram. Thereafter, the petitioners filed M.C.No.1/2020 under Section 125 of Cr.P.C for enhancement of the maintenance. It was allowed as per the impugned order and the monthly maintenance amount was enhanced to ₹1,600/- from the date of the petition. The petitioners dissatisfied with the said amount ordered has approached this Court.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. There is no appearance for the respondent.

4. The marriage is not in dispute. In M.C.No.495/2012, ₹1,000/- was ordered as monthly maintenance on 5.11.2014. The impugned order was passed on 30.10.2021. In short, the second order was passed after a lapse of seven years and a meager amount of ₹600/- is enhanced, which is no doubt too low. However, the fact remains that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top