Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53519

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
N.T.SHEREEFA – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 17129 OF 2014

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.E.C.BINEESH, SMT.M.B.SHYNI
For the Respondents: SHRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER, O.M.SHALINA, SRI.SANGEETHA RAJ.N.R-PP

A writ petition becomes infructuous when the relief sought is no longer relevant or necessary.

Headnote:The judgment addresses a writ petition filed by N.T. Shereeefa, which the petitioner claims has become infructuous. The court highlighted the petitioner's request and determined it to be without merit, leading to the dismissal of the case. The central issue revolved around whether the petition's subject matter remained valid for judicial consideration. As a conclusion, the court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought in the writ petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53519

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMDR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JN.T.SHEREEFA – AppellantVersusTHE DIRECTOR CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – RespondentWP(C) NO. 17129 OF 2014

A writ petition becomes infructuous when the relief sought is no longer relevant or necessary.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
N.T.SHEREEFA – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 17129 OF 2014