SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53519

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
N.T.SHEREEFA – Appellant
Versus
THE DIRECTOR CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.E.C.BINEESH, SMT.M.B.SHYNI
For the Respondents: SHRI.SREELAL N.WARRIER, O.M.SHALINA, SRI.SANGEETHA RAJ.N.R-PP

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought in the writ petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top