SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53521

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
MAYAN K.S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 1418 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.K.R.ARUN KRISHNAN, SMT.DEEPA K.RADHAKRISHNAN, SHRI.VISHAK K.V., SHRI.ANU T.H., SMT.ANUSREE P.A.
For the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Ongoing investigations address petitioner's grievances under Article 226, allowing court to dismiss further intervention.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks directions for investigation into alleged financial misappropriation by a cooperative society. The court notes an ongoing investigation related to the registered FIR No.1750/2025. The court found that, given this ongoing investigation, nothing further needed adjudication. The petition is hence dismissed with directions for the investigating officer to file a report at the earliest.

Table of Content
1. petitioner requests investigation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. current investigation addresses the case's grievances. (Para 3)
3. court dismisses petition based on the ongoing investigation. (Para 4)

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 26th day of November, 2025 This writ petition (civil) has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner seeking the following prayers:

i) Commanding respondent no.4 to form a special team to conduct an investigation into the financial misappropriation of the 7th respondent and the board of directors of Kollam Co operative building society Limited No.Q 157 in the interests of justice.

ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ or order directing first respondent to order a vigilance investigation against the seventh respondent and Board of Directors of the sixth respondent.

iii) Pass just and proper reliefs considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the prayer made at the time of hearing.

iv) Pass appropriate order or direction commanding the 4th respondent for proper investigation in the matter in the above writ petition (Criminal).

2. Heard both sides, in detail. Perused the relevant records.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 5 submits that, in this matter, crime No.1750/2025 has been registered by the Kollam West Police Station alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC by the accused and the investigation in the said crime is continuing.

4. By registering FIR and starting investigation, the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed. Therefore, nothing survives to be adjudicated in this writ petition.

In view of the above, this writ petition stands disposed of, directing the Investigating Officer to effectuate meaningful investigation in crime No.1750/2025 and file Final Report, at the earliest.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top