SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53523

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. Muhamed Mustaque, HARISANKAR V. MENON, JJ
CHIRAKKAL KOVILAKAM DEVASWOMS – Appellant
Versus
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR, LAND ACQUISITION – Respondent
LA.APP. NO. 208 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MAHESH V RAMAKRISHNAN
For the Respondents: SHRI.HARISH R. MENON, SRI.K.T.SHYAMKUMAR, SMT.K.N.ABHA, SRI.A.G.PRASANTH, SRI.T.K. SHAJAHAN SR GP

The court permitted the withdrawal of the appeal, affirming the right to refile as a civil revision petition.

Headnote:The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, allowing the appellant to file a civil revision petition. The court stated that the appellant could withdraw the appeal and ordered the refund of the court fee paid on the memorandum. The judgment highlights the court's permission for a subsequent filing as a significant procedural point.

A. Muhamed Mustaque, J.

The appellant is permitted to withdraw the appeal with liberty to file a civil revision petition. Accordingly, the Land Acquisition Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. The court fee paid on the memorandum of the appeal shall be refunded. The Registry shall return the certified copies forthwith.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top