SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53535

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.PRATHEEP KUMAR, J
DIBIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 11021 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MANSOOR ALI
For the Respondents: SHRI.PRATHAPAN N.R.

Court emphasizes expeditious trial and considerations for allowances in criminal proceedings.

Headnote:The petitioners, accused in C.C. No. 1316/2017, sought to quash proceedings due to settlement with the complainant. The Public Prosecutor noted serious allegations and antecedents against the accused. The Court directed disposal of the case within six months while permitting online appearance. Final decision: C.C. No. 1316/2017 to be resolved timely, with further directions as deemed necessary.

Table of Content
1. description of the case and allegations. (Para 1)
2. discussion on representation and what led to the appeal. (Para 2 , 3)
3. the court's directives regarding case disposal and allowances. (Para 4)

ORDER

Dated this the 26th day of November, 2025 The petitioners are the accused persons 1 to 10 in C.C.No.1316/2017 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kodungallur, arising out of Crime No.2660/2016 of Kodungallur police station. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 143 , 147, 148, 452, 354, 324, 427, 294(b), 506(iii) r/w 149 IPC.

2. According to the learned counsel for the petitioners, the matter has been settled between the petitioners and the defacto complainant and therefore he prayed for quashing all further proceedings against the petitioners.

3. The learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions submitted that, there are serious criminal antecedents against most of the accused persons. The allegations leveled against the petitioners are also appears to be serious in nature. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted to give a direction to the learned Magistrate to dispose of the case in a time bound manner and to permit the 1st petitioner to appear before the trial court online.

4. In the above circumstances, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to raise all contentions before the learned Magistrate. Considering the fact that this is case of the year 2017, there will be a direction to the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kodungallur to dispose of this case within a period of six months. The petitioner is permitted to approach the learned Magistrate for exempting him from personal appearance in case he so chooses.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top