Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.R.SASITH, SMT.RAJITHA V.K
For the Respondents: SRI.M.P.PRASANTH

Petitioner withdrew the plea, leading to dismissal of the case.

Headnote:The judgment pertains to CRL.M.C. No. 2885 of 2022, where the petitioner, represented by counsel, sought the dismissal of the case as not pressed. The court upheld the submission of the counsel, leading to a dismissal. The relevant legal process ended with the court's concise ruling on November 26, 2025.

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Crl. M.C may be dismissed as not pressed.

Recording the above submission, the Crl. M.C is dismissed as not pressed.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :