SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53554

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S. DIAS, J
SOBHANAKUMARI S. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 4281 OF 2024 | CRIME NO. 0/0 | CC NO. 5290 OF 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.RAMESH .P, SMT.BLEIMY T.JOSE
For the Respondents: SHRI.B.J.JOHN PRAKASH, SHRI.COLIN ALEX, SHRI.P.PRAMEL, SHRI.SOORAJ M.S., SMT.VARSHA VIJAYAKUMAR NAIR, SMT.ANAGHA MADATH THEKKEPATTE, SMT.SONA A.B.

The dismissal of a criminal miscellaneous case due to it being infructuous reflects the court's authority to terminate proceedings when no further action can be taken.

Headnote:The Court discussed the relevant sections of the NI Act, 1881 in the context of the petitioner’s legal standing. It was submitted that the criminal miscellaneous case must be dismissed as infructuous, which the Court accepted. The main issue was the relevance of the petitioner’s application following the closure of the matter. Ultimately, the Court concluded the case be dismissed as infructuous.

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Crl. M.C may be dismissed as infructuous.

Recording the above submission, the Crl. M.C is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top