Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.SAJU, A.V.SAJAN, NEELANJANA NAIR, POOJA SEBASTIAN
For the Respondents: SANAL P. RAJ

The court affirmed that a Criminal Miscellaneous Case can be dismissed as not pressed based on the petitioner’s counsel’s submission.

Headnote:Under the provisions applicable, the petitioner submitted that the Criminal Miscellaneous Case should be dismissed as not pressed. The court recognized this submission and hence dismissed the application without engagement on further merits. Resultantly, the Crl. M.C is dismissed as not pressed. The court finds no further necessity to deliberate, and thus the final outcome is substantiated by the submission of the counsel.

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Crl. M.C may be dismissed as not pressed.

Recording the above submission, the Crl. M.C is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

C.S.DIAS,JUDGE mtk/26.11.25 APPENDIX OF CRL.MC 5140/2021 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 TRUE COPY OF THE FIR NO. 251/2021 DATED

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :