SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53558

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SMT.LUDHVINA AMANDA JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NAVOD PRASANNAN PATTALI, SRI.K.V.KRISHNAKUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI.P.K.SAJEEVAN, SHRI.JINISHLAL S.B., SRI.O.U.ANISH RAJ, SMT.A.H.SINCEY, SRI.K.A.ABDUL NISTAR, SRI.B.RADHAKRISHNAN

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the Crl. M.C may be dismissed as Recording the above submission, the Crl. M.C is Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top