SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53561

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SAJU BIN SALIM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R.RENJITH, SMITHA PHILIPOSE, P.R.JAYASANKAR, DARSAN SOMANATH, MANJUSHA K, SREELAKSHMI SABU
For the Respondents: SANAL P. RAJ

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Crl.M.C. may be dismissed as withdrawn, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the final report.

Recording the above submission, but by reserving the right of the petitioner to file a fresh Crl.M.C. to challenge the final report, this Crl.M.C. is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top