SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53568

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
SABEERA @ RESHMA – Appellant
Versus
1 ANOOP – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.A.T.ANILKUMAR
For the Respondents: SMT.BHANU THILAK, SRI.T.GOPALAKRISHNAN, SHRI.S.R.PRASANTH, SHRI.VISHNU.R, SMT.AISWARYA KRISHNAN, SMT.POOJA N.S.

JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.

Sri.A.T.Anilkumar – learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this Original Petition with liberty for his client to invoke other remedies.

2. The afore request is not opposed by Sri.Bhanu Tilak – learned counsel for the 1st respondent and Sri.T.Gopalakrishnan Nair – learned counsel for the 2nd respondent.

In the aforementioned circumstances, this Original Petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn, with every other liberty as available to the parties in law being reserved.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top