IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P, J
SILVY GEORGE – Appellant
Versus
THE MANAGER ARALAM SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request for relief based on previous orders. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's finding of non-compliance with conditions. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:
i. “To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction, directing Respondent No. 3 to stop taking any further action or proceedings pursuant to Exhibit P4 against the petitioner;
ii. To allow the petitioner to remit the remaining outstanding amount in 30 monthly instalments;”
2. A perusal of the pleadings in the writ petition shows that this is the second writ petition at the instance of the petitioner, and the earlier writ petition filed by the petitioner as W.P(C)No.17467 of 2025 was disposed of by Ext.P2 judgment on 15-07-2025, permitting the petitioner to pay the outstanding amount in twenty instalments. It cannot be disputed that the petitioner has not complied with the directions contained in Ext.P2 judgment in W.P(C)No.17467 of 2025. Notwithstanding the above, this Court on 13-10-2025 passed the following interim order:
“Admit. Government Pleader takes notice for the 3rd respondent. Sri.M.Sasindran takes notice for respondent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.