Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53582

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
VENUGOPALAN .C – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 20536 OF 2024

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.SANJAY, SRI.SANIL KUMAR G., SRI.ROHIT S.
For the Respondents: SRI.K.S.PRENJITH KUMAR, CGC, SMT.O.M.SHALINA, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

In cases where petitioners superannuate during proceedings, their claims related to transfer become moot.

Headnote:The Court addressed the petition concerning the transfer of the petitioner, who has since superannuated. Considering the change in circumstances, the claim is rendered moot. Consequently, the petition was closed. The applicable statute and relevant regulations were not detailed, but the discussion centered on the transfer protocols within the Central Industrial Security Force.

JUDGMENT Dated this the 26^th day of November, 2025 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue in the writ petition relates to transfer of the petitioner. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner has superannuated and retired from service.

The writ petition is therefore closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53582

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMN.NAGARESH, JVENUGOPALAN .C – AppellantVersusUNION OF INDIA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 20536 OF 2024

In cases where petitioners superannuate during proceedings, their claims related to transfer become moot.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N.NAGARESH, J
VENUGOPALAN .C – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 20536 OF 2024