SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53589

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
M.V. PETER – Appellant
Versus
ABBAS V E – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.P.MADHU, SMT.APARNA S., SMT.MARIA GEORGE, SMT.ANU JOHNY
For the Respondents: SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

JUDGMENT

When this contempt case came up for consideration, the Government Pleader submitted that fee notice is issued to the petitioner in Form-7 application. If that is the case, this contempt case need not be retained here. Once the fee is paid by the petitioner, the respondent will do the needful in accordance with law forthwith. If there is any further violation, the petitioner is free to reopen the contempt case.

With the above observation, this contempt case is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top