SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53589

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
M.V. PETER – Appellant
Versus
ABBAS V E – Respondent
Con.Case(C) No. 2657 of 2025 | WP(C) No. 25606 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.P.MADHU, SMT.APARNA S., SMT.MARIA GEORGE, SMT.ANU JOHNY
For the Respondents: SMT VIDYA KURIAKOSE

Contempt cases may be closed upon acknowledgment of compliance by the petitioner regarding applicable fees.

Headnote:This judgment addresses contempt proceedings regarding application fees. The Court noted that notice in Form-7 was issued to the petitioner, suggesting that the contempt case may not require further retention if fees are duly paid. The petitioner retains the right to reopen the case for any future violations. The primary determination is the closure of the contempt case upon acknowledgment of the fee requirement.

JUDGMENT

When this contempt case came up for consideration, the Government Pleader submitted that fee notice is issued to the petitioner in Form-7 application. If that is the case, this contempt case need not be retained here. Once the fee is paid by the petitioner, the respondent will do the needful in accordance with law forthwith. If there is any further violation, the petitioner is free to reopen the contempt case.

With the above observation, this contempt case is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top