SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53607

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
THOMAS KURUVILA – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 31826 OF 2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY, SRI.T.A.JOY, SRI.E.S.SANEEJ, SRI.M.P.UNNIKRISHNAN, SRI.N.ABHILASH, SHRI.DEEPU RAJAGOPAL, SMT.ARDRA ANIL, SMT.ABISHA.E.R, SHRI.ALBIN VARGHESE, SMT.ANUPAMA NAIR, SMT.FATHIMA SHALU S.
For the Respondents: SRI.R.HARISHANKAR, SRI. K. JANARDHANA SHENOY, SC, KOCHI MUNICIPAL CORPN.

The court establishes the necessity for timely consideration of applications related to building permits and certificates under administrative law.

Headnote:The judgment considers the petitions for mandamus concerning the renewal of a building permit and the issuance of a completion certificate. The petitioner seeks to renew the permit and obtain a completion certificate based on pending applications. The court directs the first respondent to address these applications expeditiously, stating unequivocally that Ext.P8 should be considered within a two-month timeframe from receipt of the judgment. The outcome emphasizes the urgency and necessity for timely administrative response.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's claim for consideration of applications. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's directive for expeditious administrative action. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondent to consider and dispose the petitioner's application for renewal of building permit in tune with Ext.P4, and thereby to renew the Ext.P1 building permit and Ext.P3 extension, in the interest of Justice.

(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to consider and dispose the petitioner's application for issuing completion certificate relating to Ext.P5, and issue completion certificate, in the interest of Justice.

(iii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 1st respondent to take up consider the Ext.P8 representation submitted by the petitioner within a time in the interest of Justice.

(iv) Dispense with filing of English Translation of Vernacular documents.

(v) Grant such other reliefs as may be deemed fit and proper to consider the objections of the petitioner, in the interest of justice.”

[SIC]

2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Ext.P8 is pending before the 1st respondent and a direction may be issued to consider the same.

3. If that be the case, there can be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P8, within a time frame. Therefore, this Writ Petition(C) is disposed of with the following direction:

1. The 1st respondent is directed to consider Ext.P8 and pass appropriate orders in it, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top