Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53614

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
USHA ARAVINDAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
LA.APP. NO.136 OF 2025|LAR NO.89 OF 2013

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.PRATHEESH.P, SMT.ANJANA KANNATH, SMT.SAFNA P.S.
For the Respondents: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOLLAM

Lack of representation in court leads to dismissal for non-prosecution.

Headnote:This appeal pertains to a land acquisition case under LAR NO.89 OF 2013. The court found neither the appellants nor their advocates represented during the hearing on 19.11.2025 and 26.11.2025. Key issues included the representation of the appellants in court and the validity of the appeal with respect to procedural requirements. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution.

J U D G M E N T

On 19.11.2025, when the appeal was taken up, there was no representation for the appellants.

Today when the matter is taken up, again there is no representation for the appellants.

Therefore C.M.Application No.2 of 2025 and the appeal are dismissed for non - prosecution.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53614

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMS.MANU, JUSHA ARAVINDAN – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentLA.APP. NO.136 OF 2025|LAR NO.89 OF 2013

Lack of representation in court leads to dismissal for non-prosecution.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
S.MANU, J
USHA ARAVINDAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
LA.APP. NO.136 OF 2025|LAR NO.89 OF 2013