Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
NOUSHAD – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR KOLLAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges an order regarding unauthorized granite removal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. government pleader argues for upholding the order. (Para 3) |
| 3. court finds denial of documents violated prior court directives. (Para 4) |
| 4. court sets aside order with directions for compliance. (Para 5) |
JUDGMENT
Petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P4 order passed by the District Collector. The petitioner was initially issued with a demand for an amount of Rs.14,20,491/- alleging that the petitioner has unauthorisedly removed 76513 M.T of granite from the puramboke land and proceedings were initiated as per the provisions of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act , 1957. Appeal and revision were preferred, which were ultimately dismissed. Challenging the same, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing WP(C) No.5513 of 2019, which was disposed of as per Ext.P3, setting aside Exts.P1 and P2 and directing the appellate authority to reconsider the matter. In Ext.P3 judgment, there was a specific direction that if the petitioner makes an application before the 3rd respondent Revenue Divisional Officer all materials and reports which he would require for prosecuting
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
