JUDGMENT

Petitioner has approached this Court challenging Ext.P4 order passed by the District Collector. The petitioner was initially issued with a demand for an amount of Rs.14,20,491/- alleging that the petitioner has unauthorisedly removed 76513 M.T of granite from the puramboke land and proceedings were initiated as per the provisions of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act , 1957. Appeal and revision were preferred, which were ultimately dismissed. Challenging the same, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing WP(C) No.5513 of 2019, which was disposed of as per Ext.P3, setting aside Exts.P1 and P2 and directing the appellate authority to reconsider the matter. In Ext.P3 judgment, there was a specific direction that if the petitioner makes an application before the 3rd respondent Revenue Divisional Officer all materials and reports which he would require for prosecuting the appeal, the Revenue Divisional Officer shall furnish with copies of all materials and reports which is relied on against the petitioner in the impugned proceedings, within a period of 10 days.

2. The specific case of the petitioner is that the copies of materials and reports that have been relied on ag