Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53628

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
HASSAN KHILAR SHAH – Appellant
Versus
B.V. VIAJAYA BHARATH REDDY – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2837 OF 2025 | WP(Crl.) NO.139 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH, SHRI.YOOSUF SAFWAN T. AJMAL, SMT.PARVATHI, SHRI.ARAVIND R. NAIR
For the Respondents: SRI. SANGEETHA RAJ N.R. PP

The court found that compliance with prior directives was sufficient to close the contempt case.

Headnote:This judgement addresses compliance with directives specified in Annexure A1, with the Public Prosecutor indicating ongoing investigation by the Crime Branch. The Court concludes that the contempt case is now closed due to compliance with its orders. The final ruling underscores that the investigatory process is active.

JUDGMENT

The learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that the directions in Annexure A1 judgment had been complied with. Further investigation has already been ordered and handed over to the Crime Branch. It is further submitted that the investigation is going on.

Hence, this contempt case is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53628

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMDR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, JHASSAN KHILAR SHAH – AppellantVersusB.V. VIAJAYA BHARATH REDDY – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 2837 OF 2025 | WP(Crl.) NO.139 OF 2025

The court found that compliance with prior directives was sufficient to close the contempt case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
HASSAN KHILAR SHAH – Appellant
Versus
B.V. VIAJAYA BHARATH REDDY – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2837 OF 2025 | WP(Crl.) NO.139 OF 2025