SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53628

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
HASSAN KHILAR SHAH – Appellant
Versus
B.V. VIAJAYA BHARATH REDDY – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.T.SHEEJISH, SHRI.YOOSUF SAFWAN T. AJMAL, SMT.PARVATHI, SHRI.ARAVIND R. NAIR
For the Respondents: SRI. SANGEETHA RAJ N.R. PP

JUDGMENT

The learned Public Prosecutor on instructions submitted that the directions in Annexure A1 judgment had been complied with. Further investigation has already been ordered and handed over to the Crime Branch. It is further submitted that the investigation is going on.

Hence, this contempt case is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top