O R D E R

This Revision Petition has been filed challenging the judgment passed by the Family Court, Malappuram in M.C.No.459 of 2022.

2. The petitioner is the husband of the 1^st respondent and the father of the 2^nd respondent. The respondents filed an application for maintenance before the Family Court, Malappuram seeking monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.15,000/- and Rs.12,000/- respectively. The Family Court, after trial, granted monthly maintenance at the rate of Rs.5,000/- to the 1^st respondent and Rs.4,000/- to the 2^nd respondent. The said judgment is under challenge in this revision petition.

3. Heard both sides.

4. The marriage and paternity are not in dispute. Even though the petitioner has taken a contention that the 1^st respondent is employed, no evidence has been adduced to substantiate the said contention. Admittedly, the petitioner is a driver employed abroad. According to the 1^st respondent, the petitioner earns a monthly salary of Rs.1,00,000/-. It is denied by the petitioner. However, he has not produced any document to show his income. In Rajnesh v. Neha and Another [(2021) 2 SCC 324] , the Supreme Court held that if the husband fails to produce documentary evid