SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53636

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
N.PRAKASH – Appellant
Versus
JAYAPRAKASH E.P – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 1392 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N.PRAKASH(PARTY-IN-PERSON)
For the Respondents: E.C.BINEESH

The court affirmed that non-cognisable offence allegations permit closure of writ petitions while allowing recourse to the jurisdictional Magistrate.

Headnote:In the case of WP(CRL.) NO. 1392 OF 2025, the petitioner submitted that the offences alleged were non-cognisable and sought closure of the writ petition with leave to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate. The Court observed the petitioner's request and determined that the writ should be closed while reserving the aforementioned liberty. The main issue was whether the petition could be handled by the Magistrate given the nature of the allegations. Consequently, the Court granted the petitioner's request, concluding that jurisdictional matters should be directed towards the Magistrate for further proceedings.

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, who appeared in person, submits that since the offences alleged are non-cognisable, the writ petition may be closed with liberty to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate. Hence, the writ petition is closed reserving liberty to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Magistrate.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top