Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
BABITHA – Appellant
Versus
THE CIVIL POLICE OFFICER, CHOMBALA POLICE STATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's grievance addressed due to lack of investigation progress. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel for both sides were heard. (Para 2) |
| 3. investigation findings indicate lack of accused identification. (Para 3) |
| 4. court directs a superior officer for effective investigation and report submission. (Para 4) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner's husband died in a road accident on
28.11.2023 at about 11.00 p.m., in the National Highway in Chombala Harbor Road Junction. The Chombala police registered a crime as Crime No.704 of 2023, alleging offences punishable under Sections 279 and 304A of IPC . The grievance of the petitioner is that, so far, the investigating officer has not found out the accused. It is in these circumstances, she has approached this Court.
2. I have heard Sri.B.Krishna Mani, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Sangeetharaj.N.R, the learned Public Prosecutor.
3. The 1st respondent conducted investigation. He has filed a statement of facts. In the statement of facts, it is stated that even though an effective investigation was conducted and the statement of 55 witnesses were recorded, he could not find out who actually drove the vehicle at the time of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
