Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
RIYAS – Appellant
Versus
JULAISA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to the divorce decree based on allegations of cruelty. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. arguments against the findings of the family court regarding cruelty. (Para 4 , 8) |
| 3. evidence and credibility of testimonies related to harassment. (Para 9 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. court's interpretation of cruelty in a marital context. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. final ruling upholding the divorce decree. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
JUDGMENT
M.B.Snehalatha.J These two appeals have been preferred by the husband, challenging the judgment and decree of divorce obtained by the wife in O.P.No.907/2014 of Family Court Irinjalakuda and assailing the dismissal of O.P.No.862/2014 filed by him seeking restitution of conjugal rights.
2. We are disposing these appeals jointly as it involve identical factual disputes between the same parties.
3. The wife/respondent herein filed O.P.No.907/2014 seeking divorce under Section 2 (ii)(viii)(a)(b) and (d) of Dissolution of Muslim Marriage Act, 1939 (for short 'the Act') stating that her marriage with the appellant was held on 20.9.2010; that the appellant/husband misappropriated her 50 sovereigns of gold ornaments and ₹2,50,000/- given as patrimony. Thereafter he tortured and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
