Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
GOPINATH P., J
KRISHNAKUMAR K.G. – Appellant
Versus
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks correction of birth date for higher pension option. (Para 1) |
| 2. contention regarding timely attempts to correct records. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. court emphasizes the importance of evidence for deadlines. (Para 4) |
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is presently the Managing Director of KELTRON Component Complex Ltd., which is an establishment covered under the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 . Formerly, the petitioner was employed with the Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC), Thiruvananthapuram, for the period from 24- 01-1985 to 28-06-2006. The petitioner is a member of the Employees' Pension Scheme. The petitioner is before this court being aggrieved by the fact that though the petitioner wanted to file an option for grant of higher pension within the time specified by the Supreme Court in EPFO and another v. Sunil Kumar B. and others ; 2022 (7) KHC 12 (as extended) the petitioner was unable to do so since there was a mistake in the name as well as the date of birth of the petitioner in the records maintained by the Provident Fund Organisation. The petitioner is thus before this court seeking the following reli
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
