SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53806

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
ROBIN BINOY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
BAIL APPL. NO. 13758 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.708/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.ANIL K.MUHAMED, SRI.KRISHNAKUMAR G., SRI.AJIN SALAM, SRI.BAJEEL ABDUL RAHIMAN
For the Respondents: ADV M.K. PUSHPALATHA, SR. PP

The necessity of pre-arrest bail under the circumstances surrounding the accused's admission and the need for interrogation.

Headnote:The judgment discusses an application for pre-arrest bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The applicant, Robin Binoy, is accused in Crime No.708/2025 of Peruvanthanam Police Station, Idukki, charged with multiple offences under the Arms Act for allegedly carrying a firearm. The Court notes the necessity of interrogating the applicant due to his admission of driving the vehicle in which the firearm was found. The bail application concludes with directives regarding surrender and subsequent procedures before the investigating officer and Magistrate.

Table of Content
1. application for pre-arrest bail under the arms act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. admission necessitating interrogation. (Para 4)

O R D E R

This application is filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 seeking pre-arrest bail.

2. The applicant is accused No.3 in Crime No.708/2025 of Peruvanthanam Police Station, Idukki. The offences alleged are punishable under Sections 25 (1-B), 9(a) and

3 of the Arms Act .

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on

16.10.2025 at about 1.20 a.m., accused persons were found travelling in a pickup vehicle bearing registration no.KL-38 K-4374 through the Kokkayar-Kootickal road. The accused persons were carrying a country-made firearm. During the act of passing the firearm from one person to another, the weapon accidentally slipped and fell to the ground and the same was taken into lawful custody for further investigation as per the seizure mahazar and thereby the accused committed the aforesaid offences.

4. I have heard Sri.Anil K. Muhamed, the learned counsel for the applicant and Smt.M.K. Pushpalatha, the learned Senior Public Prosecutor. Perused the case diary.

The applicant has admitted that he was driving the vehicle in question. However, according to him, he gave a lift to the remaining accused who were carrying the alleged gun. In view of the said admission, the interrogation of the applicant is absolutely necessary to find out his complicity in the crime.

Hence, the bail application is disposed of as follows:

The applicant shall surrender before the investigating officer within one week from today. On such surrender, the investigating officer shall interrogate him. If the investigating officer forms an opinion that the applicant has to be arrested, after recording the arrest, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional Magistrate. The bail application, if any, filed by the applicant shall be disposed of by the learned Magistrate preferably on the same day itself. The applicant shall give a copy of the bail application in advance to the Prosecutor concerned.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top