SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53813

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOBIN SEBASTIAN, J
AKHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SARATHKUMAR.T.S, SHRI.ACHANKUNJU P.C, SMT.JISMEMOL JAMES, SMT.VISHNUJA VASUDEVAN
For the Respondents: SRI.SANAL P.RAJ, SRI.D.VIMAL DEV

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the matter with liberty to file a fresh application.

Recording the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top