Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53813

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOBIN SEBASTIAN, J
AKHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 10872 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.615/2021

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SARATHKUMAR.T.S, SHRI.ACHANKUNJU P.C, SMT.JISMEMOL JAMES, SMT.VISHNUJA VASUDEVAN
For the Respondents: SRI.SANAL P.RAJ, SRI.D.VIMAL DEV

The court grants permission to withdraw a petition, allowing for future applications, reflecting judicial discretion in procedural matters.

Headnote:The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the matter with liberty to file a fresh application, which the court recorded. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The court's determination was based on the request of the petitioner to permit withdrawal, reflecting judicial discretion. This involved evaluating the procedural aspects of withdrawal and the need for further applications.

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for admission, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the matter with liberty to file a fresh application.

Recording the same, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53813

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMJOBIN SEBASTIAN, JAKHIL – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 10872 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.615/2021

The court grants permission to withdraw a petition, allowing for future applications, reflecting judicial discretion in procedural matters.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
JOBIN SEBASTIAN, J
AKHIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 10872 OF 2025 | CRIME NO.615/2021