IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
KUNHEEDUTTY – Appellant
Versus
1 THE VILLAGE OFFICER EDAYUR VILLAGE – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
The writ petition is filed with the following prayers;
“a) Declare that the revenue recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner as per Ext.P5 demand notice RRC No.2018/12235/09 for realizing Rs.2.55,615/- with interest illegal, arbitrary and violative of fundamental right of the petitioner; b) Issue a writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents 1 and 2 to re-assess the liability leniently and allow the petitioner to settle the amount in easy monthly installments;
c) Issue such other appropriate writs, orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court deems, fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. It is seen that the petitioner had earlier approached this Court by filing WP(C) No.8038 of 2017, wherein, by judgment dated 12th April, 2017, the petitioner was granted instalment facility and the same was not complied with.
3. This writ petition is also of the same cause of action, seeking permission to pay the amount in instalments. In view of the directions already issued in Ext.P1, there is no merit in this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.