SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53819

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
ROBERT REYSON – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 34020 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.ELIZEBATH GEORGE, SRI.CYRIAC KURIAN, SHRI.EMMANUEL CYRIAC, SHRI.BIJOLSE JOHNKUTTY
For the Respondents: SMT. SURYA BINOY, SR. GP.

A writ petition may be dismissed if the petitioner expresses a lack of interest in pursuing it.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The judgment pertains to a writ petition under the Constitution. Facts of the Case: The petitioner sought relief under WP

(C) NO. 34020 OF 2024 but advised the court that it is not pressed.

Findings of Court:
The court recorded the petitioner's submission and dismissed the writ petition as not pressed.

Issues: The primary question was whether the writ petition should proceed based on the counsel's statement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the petitioner's lack of interest and request to dismiss warranted a dismissal of the petition without further consideration.

Result: The writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is not pressed. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top