SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 53820

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
M.SUKUMARAN AGED 41 YEARS S/O.KUNHIKANNAN NAIR – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KASARAGOD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 37889 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.MADHU, SMT.C.R.SARADAMANI, SRI.SHAHID AZEEZ, SHRI.RENJISH S. MENON
For the Respondents: GP.

A writ petition is dismissed when the prayers sought by the petitioners become infructuous, indicating lack of actionable relief.

Headnote:This case deals with the evaluation of a writ petition which became infructuous. The petitioners sought relief that had lost its relevance, leading the court to dismiss the petition as such. The court recognizes that relief must be actionable, and therefore, if prayers are no longer applicable, dismissal is warranted. As a result, the writ petition is dismissed.

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the prayers sought in the writ petition have become infructuous.

This is recorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top