IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH, J
CHINNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is the mother of the accused No.2 in S.C.No.698/2019 on the files of the Additional Sessions Court, Ottapalam. The accused No.2 is undergoing imprisonment for life as Convict No.C-203/2023 in the Central Prison and Correctional Home, Thavanoor. The convict was granted ordinary leave as per Ext.P1 order. One of the conditions in Ext.P1 is that he shall not enter into the jurisdictional limits of Ottapalam Police Station and that he should not contact any of the residents in the said Police Station limit. The petitioner is aggrieved by the said condition.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Public Prosecutor.
3. The convict is a native of Ottapalam. His house is situated within the limits of Ottapalam Police Station, Palakkad. So the condition No.1 imposed will defeat the very purpose of granting ordinary leave. No reason has been shown in Ext.P1 order for imposing such stringent conditions. Hence, the condition imposed in Ext.P1 order that the convict shall not enter into the jurisdictional limits of the Ottapalam Police Station is hereby lifted. The convict shall report before the SHO, Ottapalam Police Station
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.