Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
BINU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused seeks to quash proceedings based on settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel confirms amicable resolution of disputes. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court discusses the appropriateness of quashing powers. (Para 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
Dated this the 27th day of November, 2025 The petitioner is the accused in C.C.No.206/2024 on the file of the Court of the Judicial First Class Magistrate-I, Varkala, which has arisen from Crime No.84/2024 registered by the Kadakkavoor Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 341, 324, 326 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure-A2 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.
4. The learned coun
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
