IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, J
NISHAD – Appellant
Versus
UNNEEN @ UNNEENKUTTY MUSALIYAR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Dated this the 13rd day of November, 2025)
This petition is filed by the petitioner/plaintiff for setting aside the orders dated 08.02.2024 passed by the Munsiff Magistrate, Mannarkkad in I.A.No.1104/2023 & IA No.1105/2023 in O.S.No.209/2021 filed by the respondents for condonation of delay and for setting aside the ex-parte judgment.
2. Heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner filed a suit against the respondents, O.S.No.209/2021. A summons has been served on the defendants but placed ex- parte. Accordingly, the trial court decreed the suit of the plaintiff on 23.08.2023. Subsequent to the passing of decree, the defendants, after the appealable period, filed application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 18 days and another application filed under Order 9 Rule
13 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for setting aside the ex-parte judgment. Though, notice was issued to the plaintiff, it was not served, but a paper publication was taken, to be appeared by the plaintiff on 03.02.2024. When the plaintiff appeared through counsel on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.