Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
ABDU SANUF T – Appellant
Versus
SOUTH INDIAN BANK – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to account freezing due to lack of connection to alleged crimes. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's reiteration of compliance requirements for account freezing and the importance of magistrate oversight. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. details procedures for the bank and police actions regarding account freezing, emphasizing rights of the petitioner. (Para 10) |
JUDGMENT
The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition challenging the debit
1.
freezing/lien of his Bank account with the Respondent/Bank at the requisition of the Police authorities. The case of the Petitioner is that the Petitioner is not an accused in the Crime registered by the Police Authorities against some other persons, in which the requisition was made; that the Petitioner is in no way connected with the said Crime; and that the debit freezing/lien of the account is in violation of Sections 106 & 107 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 ( BNSS )
and
In spite of service of notice to the Respondent Nos.2 and 3, 2.
there is no appearance for the Respondent No.2 and 3. The Registry of this Court received a copy of the communication addressed to the Gove
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
