Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, MRS. M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
MARYKUTTY – Appellant
Versus
GRACYKUTTY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of facts and relationships between parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. trial court's findings and rulings. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. key arguments presented by the parties. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's analysis of evidence and scrutiny of claims. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. final judgment and order of the court. (Para 28) |
JUDGMENT [Mat.Appeal Nos.154/2024, 257/2024]
Devan Ramachandran, J.
The appellant assails the judgment and decree of the learned Family Court, Chavara in O.P.(Others) No.755/2016 and the counterclaim therein, asserting it to be illegal and unlawful.
2. A brief look at the essential facts involved in this case will be necessary, to avoid confusion as we go forward.
3. Respondents 1 and 2 – namely Smt.Gracykutty and Sri.Yesudhasan, are husband and wife; and the appellant – Smt.Marykutty is the sister of Sri.Yesudhasan, thus being the sister- in-law of Smt.Gracykutty. The parties will hereinafter referred to by their names to avoid any chance of ambiguity.
4. Smt.Gracykutty says that she purchased 4.05 Ares of land using her patrimony from her late mother-in-law – Smt.Thressia, through Ext.A3 S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
