Back
Next 
2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 54466
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM, J
SAL SABEEL – Appellant
Versus
SREENIVASAN – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2008 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.1390 OF 2025
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.VISWANATH SALISH, SHRI.AKASH JITTHU T., SMT.NIDHA SHERIN, SMT.SANDRA PAUL
For the Respondents: SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR, SMT.KEERTHI K.NARAYANAN
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.VISWANATH SALISH, SHRI.AKASH JITTHU T., SMT.NIDHA SHERIN, SMT.SANDRA PAUL
For the Respondents: SRI.K.P.SUJESH KUMAR, SMT.KEERTHI K.NARAYANAN
The court allows the petitioner the opportunity to challenge subsequent bank requisitions affecting account operation following prior court judgments.
Headnote:The judgment concerns a contempt of court case where the petitioner challenges the bank's refusal to allow account operation due to further requisitions received post-judgment, invoking the court's review of compliance with its prior orders. The court concludes that the contempt case is closed, allowing the petitioner to challenge the requisition. The final verdict states, 'the Contempt of Court Case is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said requisition.'
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. submission from bank regarding requisitions. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's decision regarding contempt case closure. (Para 2) |
JUDGMENT
1. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submitted that after the date of judgment further requisition were received by the bank and hence the bank could not permit the petitioner to operate the account.
2. In view of the said submission, the Contempt of Court Case is closed giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the said requisition.
Sd/-
