Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
JAIMAL KUMAR C P – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing based on amicable settlement. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counsel confirms settlement and non-pursuit of further prosecution. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court affirms ability to quash proceedings when not grave. (Para 6 , 7) |
ORDER
The petitioner is the 2nd accused in C.C.No.60/2020 on the file of the Court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thrissur (Trial Court), which has arisen from Crime No.3473/2016 registered by the Town East Police Station, Thrissur, alleging commission of the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent, who has executed Annexure A5 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 3rd respondent.
4. The learned counsel on either side submits that,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
