SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 54908

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.JAYARAM
For the Respondents: SHRI.A.M.THOMAS (AYKAN)

O R D E R

The petitioners are the accused in S.C.No.687 of

2018 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Court, Ottappalam ('Trial Court', in short), which originates from Crime No.163 of 2018 registered by the Pattambi Police Station, Palakkad, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 341 , 323, 324, 308 and 506(ii)

read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure A14 affidavit, affirming the settlement.

3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the 4th petitioner is a person with criminal antecedents. He is a history sheeter and is involved in four other crimes.

5. The scope and ambit of the inherent powers of this Court to quash criminal proceedings on

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top