IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C.S.DIAS, J
SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
O R D E R
The petitioners are the accused in S.C.No.687 of
2018 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Court, Ottappalam ('Trial Court', in short), which originates from Crime No.163 of 2018 registered by the Pattambi Police Station, Palakkad, alleging the commission of the offences punishable under Sections 341 , 323, 324, 308 and 506(ii)
read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
2. The petitioners have invoked the inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023, to quash all further proceedings in the above case. It is asserted that the dispute that led to the registration of the crime has been amicably settled between the petitioners and the 2nd respondent, who has executed Annexure A14 affidavit, affirming the settlement.
3. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned Public Prosecutor, and the learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.
4. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the 4th petitioner is a person with criminal antecedents. He is a history sheeter and is involved in four other crimes.
5. The scope and ambit of the inherent powers of this Court to quash criminal proceedings on
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.